Motivational Interviewing as a Treatment for Addiction

Motivational Interviewing is a therapeutic technique for helping people make changes in their lives, which has been applied effectively to the treatment of addictions.

motivational cartoonThe spirit of Motivational Interviewing is based on three key concepts: collaboration between the therapist and the person with the addiction, rather than confrontation by the therapist; drawing out the individual’s ideas, rather the therapist imposing their ideas; and autonomy of the person with the addiction, rather than the therapist having authority over them.

Collaboration vs Confrontation

Collaboration is the partnership that is formed between the therapist and the person with the addiction. This partnership is based on the point of view and experiences of the person with the addiction.

This contrasts with some other approaches to addictions treatment, which are based on the therapist confronting the person with the addiction, and imposing their point of view about the person’s addictive behavior. Collaboration has the effect of building rapport between the therapist and the person with the addiction, and allows the person with the addiction to develop trust towards the therapist, which can be difficult in a confrontational atmosphere.

This does not mean that the therapist automatically agrees with the person with the addiction. Although the person with the addiction and their therapist may see things differently, the therapeutic process is focused on mutual understanding, not the therapist being right and the person with the addiction being wrong.

Drawing Out Rather Than Imposing Ideas

The approach of the therapist drawing out the individual’s own ideas, rather than the therapist imposing their opinions is based on the belief that the motivation, or wish, to change comes from the person with the addiction, not from the therapist. No matter how much the therapist might want the person to change their behavior, it will only happen if that individual also wants to change their behavior. So it is the therapist’s job to “draw out” the person’s true motivations and skills for change, not to tell the person with the addiction what to do.

Autonomy vs. Authority

Unlike some other treatment models that emphasize the doctor or the therapist as an authority figure, Motivational Interviewing recognizes that the true power for making changes rests within the person with the addiction, not within the therapist. Ultimately, it is up to the individual to follow through with making changes happen. This is empowering to the individual, but also gives them responsibility for their actions.

How Change Happens in Motivational Interviewing

Four guiding principles form the basis of the Motivational Interviewing approach. Although each person’s process of overcoming an addiction will be different, the therapist will hold true to these principles throughout each individual’s process. These principles are vital to establishing trust within the therapeutic relationship.

Empathy and Acceptance

People with addictions are often reluctant to go into treatment, because they don’t believe that the therapist, who, after all, is working to end people’s addictions, will understand why the addictive behavior means so much to them. Many, especially those who have put up with other people criticizing their behavior, believe they will be judged, some even feeling guilty about their behavior and feeling judgment would be valid. But judgment simply is not what Motivational Interviewing is about.

Instead of judging the person with the addiction, the therapist focuses on understanding the situation from the addicted person’s point of view. This is known as “empathy.” Empathy does not mean that the therapist agrees with the person, but that they understand and that the individual’s behavior makes sense to them (or did at the time the behavior was carried out). This creates an atmosphere of acceptance.

Helping People to Make Up Their Minds

Motivational Interviewing recognizes that people with addictions are usually ambivalent and uncertain about whether or not they want to change. Their addiction has probably already had consequences for them, which have brought them into treatment. Yet they have developed their addiction as a way of coping with life, and they do not necessarily like the idea of giving that up.

Motivational Interviewing helps people to make up their minds about how to move forward, by helping the individual to look at the advantages and disadvantages of different choices and actions. So without pressurizing the person, goals and actions can be developed in this trusting, collaborative atmosphere, which are based on the individual’s own needs, wishes, goals, values and strengths.

Developing New Understanding

Motivational Interviewing as an approach recognizes that change does not always happen easily or just because the individual wants it. It is natural for the person to change their mind many times about whether they want to give up their addiction, and what that process, and their new lifestyle, will look like.

Rather than challenging, opposing or criticizing the person with the addiction, the therapist will help the individual to reach a new understanding of themselves and what their addiction means to them. They do this by re-framing, and offering different interpretations of situations that come up in the change process, typically which increase the person’s motivation to change. All of this is based on the individual’s own goals and values, which have already been explored.

Being Supportive

The therapist will always support the person’s belief in their own power to make the changes they want. At the beginning, the therapist may have more confidence in the individual than they have themselves, but this changes with ongoing support.

May 20, 2015


3 responses to “Motivational Interviewing as a Treatment for Addiction”

  1. Excellent article? The collaborative approach supports individual capability and responsibility for the healing process.

  2. Ed Botsko says:

    I wholkeheartedly agree with the concept of collaboration between therapist/coach and the client.. If “treatment” is to work, the client must buy into the process . Having them actively share in the definition of this process becomes the basis for moving forward. Sometimes you must confront them about abhorrent behavior, but that must also follow up with agreement that this behavior is a roadblock to success…
    No one said this would be “easy”….

  3. Charles Westheafer says:

    About time, I have been suggesting this type of approach for MANY years ,the Social work Assoc in Australia have ‘told’ me I have no idea what I am talking about! I tell people I don’t care how you have been diagnosed, I want to understand how YOU view your situation and behaviour and go through a process of examining how YOU assess YOUR behaviour and how do you think OTHERS assess what you are doing. This is only a ‘start’ process. Which one is correct, are you sure!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

8 + 5 =